South American Educators Meet to Redefine Their Sociopolitical Role

Mba Mbulu asked:

South American Educators Meet to Redefine Their SocioPolitical Role

Soon, teachers and educators across Latin America and Spain will be attending the Fifth Ibero-American Conference of Teachers, Educators and Researchers ((Quinto Encuentro IberoAmericano de Colectivas y Redes de Maestros que Hacen Investigacion e Innovacion Desde Su Escuela y Comunidad). One of their objectives is to make teachers and educators authors of and protagonists for the emancipation of the educational process. The hope is that teachers can expand their influence beyond the limits of their school rooms; that they can mobilize and organize to the extent that a pedagogy of emancipation can spread beyond school walls and influence the socio-educational and political realms.

Participating in this year’s event will be representatives from Argentina, Spain, Colombia, Mexico, Venezuela, and Brasil. Representatives and teachers from Bolivia, Chile, Cuba, Ecuador and Nicaragua are also expected to attend and participate. The Venezuelan chapter will host the event this year. Its National Coordinator is Professor Mirna Sojo Sojo. She will be assisted by Maritza Lopez, Arturo Perez and a host of other dedicated and forward thinking educators.

While discussing the conference with Professor Sojo and when perusing the informational materials that have been distributed, the theme of emancipating the educational process is a recurring one. But emancipating it from what, some might ask? Could the answer be status quo governments? Many in the United States are convinced that the educational process is not geared toward developing people but controlling them and preparing them to perform tasks that serve the interests of government and big business. Apparently this train of thought is prevalent in other countries as well. Could it be that progressive educators in the United States can look to educators in South America for a measure of guidance?

The aims of the conference include deepening the interchange of experiences among teachers from the participating countries, strengthening the learning experience and teaching techniques, recognizing the teaching experiences that promote forms of organization, articulating proposals that perpetuate the production and sharing of knowledge between teachers and communities, recognizing the educational experiences that spring from the communities and empowering the conference’s mobilization movement within the participating countries.

The central themes that will be covered during the conference are various but interrelated. They include:

(1) Exploration of what goes into making a teacher or educator. Taken into consideration are the teacher’s personal, practical and preparatory experiences, and how they influence his or her ability to relate to and interact with those who are being taught;

(2) Exploration of practical and innovative teaching methods. The construction and development of curricula take front stage during this segment;

(3) Exploration of political projects that focus on what actions teachers can take to emancipate the formal educational process. How can teachers harness their power so that formal education is made more responsive to the needs of individuals within a community as opposed to the needs of governments and corporations? What can teachers do to facilitate the incorporation of multiculturalism, ethnic experiences, multiple languages and other such factors that tend to be neglected or trivialized by status quo educators and administrators;

(4) Exploration of emerging educational techniques and experiences; and

(5) Exploration of scientific and occupational initiatives.

The conference, which is held every two years, will begin on July 13, 2008 and continue until July 20. The organizers have separated Venezuela into fifty expeditionary school district routes. For the first four days, each participant will stay in one of these districts. Each district will accommodate between 15 and 25 participants, who will be able to meet with teachers and members of the community, interchange ideas and objectives and discover how to make community objectives a more integral part of the education process. Participants from other countries will thereby have the opportunity to actually experience what teachers and community members experience and emancipate the educational process by augmenting the role and relevance of community priorities. Attendees will spend the final three days in or near Caracas, attending workshops and meetings that bring most of the participants together.

In the words of Professor Sojo, “As a consequence of this conference, we want to produce a document that makes a strong case for an educational alternative free of neoliberal and capitalist influences. A high quality, free education that is beneficial to our communities can be provided.”

The Fifth Ibero-American Conference of Teachers and Researchers is open to participation by non Spanish speaking educators, and translators are in place to accommodate them. For more information google keyword redcires.

Ridiculous World Cup Spots Allocation To Be Changed

Martin Sejas asked:

Sepp Blatter was in South Africa last week to check on the progress of the nation’s World Cup bid. During his stay, he discussed how the World Cup qualifying quotas could change in the future so that Africa could have more places in the World Cup finals.

Now Blatter is never to be taken seriously, everything he says it politically motivated, including this latest statement. This is just part of the “World Cup package” so to speak. Africa was awarded the World Cup, and this is just some extra icing on the cake, after all, you need to keep the CAF happy. The point he raises about redistributing the World Cup places around the world however, is one that should be discussed for future tournaments. Although the current setup is adequate it can be improved.

The current setup is as follows:

Host – 1, Africa – 5, Asia – 4.5, Oceania – 0.5, Europe – 13, CONCACAF – 3.5, South America – 4.5

I have no objections to the host qualifying automatically, it is an integral part of the World Cup and it’d be stupid to change that.

Africa lives and breathes football. It is the national sport of most countries and in some poorer countries its the only sport they know. During the 90’s and up until Germany 2006, Africa was mainly about Cameroon and Nigeria.

These teams consistently performed, however, in recent history we’ve seen the emergence of teams like Cote D’Ivoire, Ghana and Egypt amongst others. This shows that the continent has depth, and because of this they certainly deserve an extra spot at least. Verdict: Increase places from 5 to 6

Asia is one of the fastest growing confederations in the world. This was due to it hosting the World Cup in 2002 and also the introduction of Australia into the confederation. Korea, Japan and Australia have all had success at recent World Cups. With Australia coming in, there is another big player in the mix to qualify. For these reasons, Asia, justifiably, should have their places increased slightly. Verdict: Increase places from 4.5 to 5

Oceania should not be a confederation. When your top ranked team is in the 100s you know there is a problem. With all due respect, with Australia out of the mix now, this confederation consists of New Zealand and some pacific islands, many of which have players who are amateurs. 0.5 places is too much.

Yes you read that correctly, too much. In theory, if the top team in the confederation had a ranking of 64 they’d deserve 0.5 spots because there are in total 32 spots. Oceania, with a ranking in the 100s, therefore deserves less.

I propose we bring back the system in place for qualifying for USA 94, where Oceania had 0.25 spots. Confused, well don’t be. All 0.25 means is that they’ll need to playoff twice to get a spot in the World Cup finals. With teams as pathetic as this, Oceania deserves a hard run into the finals, because let’s face it, if this confederation was represented at the World Cup, many games would be a farce, and we all know it. Verdict: Reduce places from 0.5 to 0.25

Europe is probably the strongest confederation in the world. Not only does it have some amazing teams, but it has incredible depth, and nothing can be taken for granted. Every World Cup, there are handful of very talented teams who are unlucky and miss out. Unfortunately they have 13 spots already, which is a very large chunk of the pie, and increasing the places wouldn’t be fair. Verdict: Remain as is on 13

I will never understand why CONCACAF has 3.5 places. CONCACAF is basically Oceania plus Mexico and the USA, am I wrong? That’s the harsh reality. So the calculation is simple, 2 + 0.25 = 2.25. Frankly, the USA doesn’t care about football at all.

Their people would rather bask in their baseball, basketball and NFL. They have no respect for the world’s most popular sport. Their spot should go to someone who cares, from Africa, Asia or Europe. For practical purposes however, I’ll have to maintain that the USA have been competitive in previous World Cups, and deserve a spot. Verdict: Reduce from 3.5 to 2.25

South America should remain as is. I have no objections. Verdict: Remain as is on 4.5

So in summary:

Host – 1, Africa – 6, Asia – 5, Oceania – 0.25, Europe – 13, CONCACAF – 2.25, South America – 4.5

Playoffs:

Playoff 1: Winner Oceania Vs 3rd place CONCACAF

Playoff 2: Winner of Playoff 1 Vs 5th Place South America

The winner of Playoff 2 advances to the World Cup finals.

tripso.com | A quest for an international travel capable smartphone

The smartphone should be suitable for international travel , minimally to Europe, the Middle East, and Central and South America, the locations outside the country to which I travel with at least some regularity, which means to me it …

Read more from the original source: 
tripso.com | A quest for an international travel capable smartphone