In any case, Jason appears to be conceding that, at best, Maher meets only 2/4 criteria, with 1/4 ( science ) an EPIC FAIL and the other 1/4 questionable at best.
Original post:
Bill Maher and "anti-science" : Respectful Insolence
In any case, Jason appears to be conceding that, at best, Maher meets only 2/4 criteria, with 1/4 ( science ) an EPIC FAIL and the other 1/4 questionable at best.
Original post:
Bill Maher and "anti-science" : Respectful Insolence